WHITE BOY REMIXED
By David J. Leonard | With thanks to NewBlackMan
Monday, July 18, 2011.
This
summer I have dedicated to reading that stack of books I have been
wanting to read. The fourth installment (I will write about the other
three books on my blog) was Mark Naison’s memoir – White Boy.
Naison, a professor of African American Studies at Fordham University,
chronicles his personal, political and academic journey, responding to
those who have ubiquitously asked how he as a white man became a
professor of African American Studies. With a tremendous amount of
honesty, openness, complexity, and vulnerability, Naison explores his
own history as a teacher, activists, and source of community
empowerment.
While
the book chronicles a powerful story of the 1960s – the anti-war
movement, the Panthers, Columbia, identity politics – it is a story of
a dynamic man whose life and insights teach us just as he has taught
his students for several decades. In telling the story of the “white
African American Studies professors, Naison offers a narrative that
highlights how whiteness matters but how it does not define or
over-determine the arch of his life or career. It is a story that
resonates with me on so many levels, leading me to want to share my own
story.
Like
Mark Naison, I have been consistently asked about my entry into Ethnic
Studies. In my first class at Washington State University, I had a
student that constantly wanted to know my story. The student could not
understand why this White guy was teaching African American film – what
had lead me to be me – In the course of the class, he asked “How I can
to be the Eminem of Ethnic Studies?” While the class oohed and aahed,
some thinking it was a slight against me and others thinking it was a
point of celebration, I saw it as a good question, one that could lead
(and did) into some important conversations. Another day I had a group
of students who came to my office asking me to settle a bet about how I
came to Ethnic Studies, each having a different theory – (a) I grew up
in the Black community; (b) I had a Black girlfriend or a Black wife
who had taught and encouraged me to learn; (c) I was just down. In
fact, I have been asked several times if I have a Black girlfriend who
educated me about blackness, taught me to be committed and down, and
pushed me down my educational and career path.
On
another level, I have been asked if I am a “culture vulture,” in the
tradition of Elvis, in that I am “taking” and “impersonating” something
that I am not, in my educational and professional choices. I have also
experienced much celebration being a white guy in ethnic studies. Most
often such comments reflect desires for colorblindness as a presumed
end goal; that is, my presence in Ethnic Studies supposedly embodies
the fulfillment of King’s dream or a sign of progress. A student once
sent me an e-mail that said that world was changing racially, for the
better, because the best rapper was white, best golfer is black, best
basketball player was Asian ...and their ethnic studies teacher was
white. Not to be outdone, a student cited my presence in Ethnic Studies
as evidence of colorblindness, to discount our discussions about racism
and inequality. However, what the student failed to see is whether or
not their teacher was White, or the president is Black, racism remains
a constant.
I
am certainly defined by my whiteness, whether teaching ethnic studies
or driving through Colfax; yet my relationship to Ethnic Studies,
social justice struggles, my scholarship, my pedagogy, my ideology, my
gaze upon the world, and my understanding of
racism/privilege/inequality is not overly determined by a monolithic
white identity formation. As Bakari Kitwana argues in Why White Kids Love Hip Hop,
“Each Person has a unique story that brought him or her to hip-hop.
Looking at the micro reasons as well as the macro ones helps us make
sense of a contemporary hip-hop scene in which a new generation is
affected by America’s racial history and in the process is constructing
a new politics.” In others words, my arrival to and place within the
field of Ethnic Studies (or a larger racialized discursive field)
reflects a myriad of factors and experiences, ones that are neither
defined exclusively by nor immune from the realities of whiteness,
racism, and contemporary racial politics.
I
grew up in Los Angeles in a middle-class family that spent most of its
income on schools, not so much because of concerns of “safety” or even
the quality of education available in the public school system. I went
to an elementary school founded by Hollywood Communists, including
Charlie Chaplin. During my life, I have never gone to school where we
did not call our teachers by their first name; I did not receive
“grades” until the 9th grade. More instructive, both detention and the
pledge of allegiance were completely foreign concepts to me until high
school. This educational background clearly established a foundation
but this only tells part of the story.
I
was also somewhat typical of many white kids growing up in the 1980s
and 1990s. Often times I could be found rocking my Malcolm X hat,
cross-colors shorts, and historically Black college sweatshirt. I
sagged my pants, wore my starter jackets and had a swagger that I
thought embodied my sense of bravado. For a couple days, I even had my
hair braided, quickly removing them after I was serenaded with “Kris
will make you jump” during a pick-up basketball game. Not surprisingly,
I was never conscious of the process of appropriation, nor was I
initially conscience of the inherent power/violence in “eating the
other.” I was like so many kids that we see on campus, in that I saw my
performative hip-hop identity as both “me being me,” and also as
something good. I think Bill Yousman best describes my initial
appropriation of hip-hop culture within my own imagination in the
following terms:
White
youth adoption of Black Cultural forms in the 21rst century is also a
performance, one that allows Whites to contain their fears and
animosities towards Blacks through rituals not of ridicule, as in
previous eras, but of adoration. Thus, although the motives behind
their performance may initially appear to be different, the act is
still a manifestation of White Supremacy, albeit a white supremacy that
is in crisis and disarray, rife with confusion and contradiction (In
Kitwana 103).
While
he emphasizes how fascination and fetishization often coexists and
fosters white youth resistance to anti-racist activism, through either
actual opposition or simple erasure, denial and ignorance about racism,
Bakari Kitwana celebrates the transformative possibilities in hip-hop:
“My belief is that rather than being resistant, many white hip-hop kids
have yet to realize that is up to them to create such anti-racist
programs.” More specifically, he writes how hip-hop and spaces of
hip-hop have provided a new arena of public space where a new racial
politics has the potential to form. At a certain level, my own
experiences with hip-hop mirrors the optimism offered by Kitwana. For
me, hip-hop was a place of entry to social justice and anti-racist
scholarship, teaching, and practice.
Whereas
rock n’ roll seemed to be central to Mark Naison’s political,
educational, and personal development, hip-hop provided a powerful form
of socialization for me. While I could talk about a number of examples,
from how listening to NWA or Public Enemy pushed me to examine the
history of policing within communities of color or how Arrested
Development forced me to contemplate the realities of privilege,
poverty, and homelessness in the United States, one song that inspired
me to become a teacher was KRS One’s “You Must Learn.” It introduced me
to an unknown history that I came to realize was erased from dominant
historical memory. It ultimately led me into library, encouraging me to
question my schooling and those “self evident truths.” Yet, it was not
just the music.
There
are countless other experiences, from my short time at University of
Oregon and my undergraduate and graduate experiences at UCSB and UCB,
to the Los Angeles uprising, that shaped not only my livelong passions
but my identity and ethos. More than any other experience, the reason I
am a white professor of ethnic studies stems from the influences of and
mentorship I have received since an undergraduate. I have benefited
tremendously from teachers, peers, and students who did not discourage
or shun me (what is often assumed to the case), but instead educated,
nurtured, challenged, and inspired me.
Kofi
Buenor Hadjor, an instructor of black studies at UCSB, did it all.
Beyond the classroom Kofi was a mentor. We used to sit and talk about
the O.J. Simpson trial, police brutality, US policy toward Africa; his
time with Kwame Nkrumah, Mao and Dubois; his thoughts about health care
inside the U.S. and herbalism; we would talk religion, family, gender;
he taught about humility and mentorship, compassion and community.
While my parents planted the seeded, he molded me into the person, the
professor, the scholar, and the advocate of social justice that I am
today. He demanded in me respect for history and for books; he fostered
in me a passion for sharing knowledge; he required of me self-critique
whether in class or helping out around his house.
One
day, Kofi, who was recovering from a stroke, asked me to go buy some
fruit from the store. When I returned from the store with apples,
bananas and pears, he took a moment to highlight the politics and
privileges embodied in fruit. To him, these were “first world fruits,”
and he wanted a mango or a papaya. I ultimately got him that mango,
only then realizing I had no idea how to cut this fruit. In this
instance, I learned how about my own privileges blinded me to the
experiences of others; he taught me so much about myself. More than the
specifics, he taught me the power of learning and teaching. Some 15
years later, I have so many vivid memories about his lectures, our
private conversations, and the many lessons he taught me.
I
just wish I was able to sit in one more of his classes or simply sit in
his living room so we could talk one more time. Mark Naison’s book
reminded me of Kofi influence and hopefully one day I will be able to
visit Dr. Naison’s class because it is clear that he is able to inspire
just like my mentor Kofi.
***
David
J. Leonard is Associate Professor in the Department of Critical
Culture, Gender and Race Studies at Washington State University,
Pullman. He has written on sport, video games, film, and social
movements, appearing in both popular and academic mediums. His work
explores the political economy of popular culture, examining the
interplay between racism, state violence, and popular representations
through contextual, textual, and subtextual analysis. He is the author
of Screens Fade to Black: Contemporary African American Cinema and the forthcoming After Artest: Race and the War on Hoop (SUNY Press). Leonard blogs @ No Tsuris.