By Mark Naison | @McFireDogg | with thanks to NewBlackMan (in Exile)
Saturday, April 11, 2015.
As I struggle to come to terms with the untimely death of Walter Scott, shot in the back while running away from a police officer after a dispute over a faulty tail light, I suddenly came to a startling and disturbing realization: Walter Scott was the fourth unarmed African American man I know of whose killing by a police officer in a highly publicized case came over a minor violation that could easily have been overlooked rather than a major crime.
The first of these deaths, that of Bronx teenager Ramarley Graham, took place three years ago, when narcotics officers, suspecting him of possessing marijuana, chased him into his family’s home in the North Bronx and shot him to death in the bathroom, with his grandmother watching. That anyone is even being arrested for marijuana possession represents questionable policy; that they should be killed by law enforcement during such an arrest is unimaginable. But it did happen, leading to the Graham family winning a 4 million dollar wrongful death suit against the city of New York
Next came the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson Missouri. Much attention has been directed at Michael Brown’s role in a dispute at a convenience store shortly before his death, but when Officer Wilson decided to approach Michael Brown and his friend, it was for what we in New York call “jaywalking.” None of the tragic events that followed would have taken place had not Officer Wilson decided to challenge the two young men for walking in the middle of the street on a little traveled residential block. That this was a subject for police intervention could easily be questioned; that it led to the death of an unarmed young man is as unfathomable as it is awful.
The final death is that of Eric Garner, which came after police confronted him for selling “lucies” ( illegally acquired cigarettes) on the street. Here is another case where police could easily have overlooked the offending action, as the person committing the offense was unarmed, and not causing harm to anyone else.
Let’s look at all these cases in tandem. Ramarely Graham, killed for possessing marijuana. Michael Brown, killed for jaywalking, Eric Garner, killed for selling illegal cigarettes. Walter Scott, killed for an out of operation tail light.
There are many questions we can and should ask about how the race of these individuals factored into their deaths, but we also need to interrogate the strategy of law enforcement they reflect–namely “Broken Windows policing.” Should the police be confronting and arresting people for minor breaches of the law and prepared to use deadly force in such incident? Should police officers be rated on the number of such arrests so their careers depend on making them? And should municipalities depend on the fines that result from such arrests as sources of revenue?
Dealing with internalized as well as overt racial biases is something all of us–not only police officers–should be doing.
But if we want to reduce police/community tensions, we may want to rethink how police are deployed and move away from “Broken Windows Policing” to strategies which are less rigid and more community oriented.
+++
Mark Naison is a Professor of African-American Studies and History at Fordham University and Director of Fordham’s Urban Studies Program. He is the author of two books, Communists in Harlem During the Depressionand White Boy: A Memoir. Naison is also co-director of the Bronx African American History Project (BAAHP). Research from the BAAHP will be published in a forthcoming collection of oral histories Before the Fires: An Oral History of African American Life From the 1930’s to the 1960’s.
Broken Windows, Broken Policy and the Death of Walter Scott
